Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
G. S. Kulkarni, Aarti Sathe, JJ
Techno Freshworld LLP – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mandatory navy noc for nearby constructions challenged (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. land history, society formation, redevelopment permissions granted (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. phased ccs issued without defence noc requirement (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. delays resolved, further approvals; stop work issued late (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. navy mandates noc under circulars, dcpr for 500m (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. circulars superseded; arbitrary pick-and-choose violates article 14 (Para 40 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 7. navy defends security, uniform application, circular revival (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 8. undisputed facts confirm mhada approvals sans noc (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 9. mod circulars evolution reduces noc radius to 50m (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91) |
| 10. abeyance does not revive superseded circulars; rights crystallized (Para 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97) |
| 11. navy selective enforcement arbitrary, violates article 14 (Par |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
