SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351460

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF THE CITY OF PUNE – Appellant
Versus
SATISHKUMAR S. AGARWAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3009 OF 2000 Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune having its Head Office at Shivajinagar, Pune – 411005 …Petitioner Versus Satishkumar Satyanaran Agarwal aged about 42 years, Occupation - Business, residing at 199, Ganesh Peth, Pune -411 002 …Respondent .........…

Mr. Abhishek Roy, Ms. Sweta Shah i/by Abhijit P. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner None for the Respondent .........…

CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J.

RESERVED ON : 16th OCTOBER 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 27th NOVEMBER 2025 JUDGMENT :

1. This Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks direction to set-aside the Judgment and Order dated 3rd April 1999 passed by learned XIIth Additional District Judge Pune, at Pune in Civil Appeal No. 434 of 1993 filed against the Judgment and order dated 2nd April 1993 passed by the Learned Small Causes Judge, Pune in Municipal Appeal No. 97 of 1990 whereby the Learned Additional District Judge had dismissed the appeal preferred under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 (the “BPMC Act”) by the Petitioner thereby confirming the Judgment and order dated 2n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top