SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3824

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
BHARAT BHOGILAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
KALELKAR SURGICALS PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


P.C.

1. All the captioned Suits have been filed for infringement of two Patents which were granted to the Plaintiff vide Orders dated 14th August 2003 and 27th October 2003 respectively. The first patent is titled 'Improved laser marking and engraving machine', and the other, 'Process of manufacturing engraved design articles on metals or non-metals' (“the said patents”).

2. Briefly stated, it is the common stand of the Defendants in all the captioned Suits that the Plaintiff did not have locus and/or any cause of action for filing the said Suits since the above-mentioned patents had been revoked on the date when the captioned Suits were filed. It is thus the case of the Defendants that a Suit for infringement of the said patents would not be maintainable. Accordingly, the Defendants in the captioned Suits have filed the Notice of Motion No. 1604 of 2019, Notice of Motion No. 1602 of 2019 and Notice of Motion No. 1593 of 2019 under the provisions of Order XIII-A of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ('CPC'), seeking summary dismissal of the Suit. The Defendant in Suit No. 359 of 2017 has additionally filed Notice of Motion No. 820 of 2018 under the provisions of Order VII, Rule 11 of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top