....................

...................

JUDGEMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Gite, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Mr. Sanghavi, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1; Mr. Chavan, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 and Mr. Sawant, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.7 and 8.

2. Present Writ Petition is heard finally today. It was admitted in 2002. Three sets of parties are contesting the present Petition. Petitioners are the legal heirs of Ushabai Bhimrao Chavan. Respondent No.1 is Ganpat Tatya Khadtale, the principal contesting Respondent whereas Respondent Nos.5 and 6 are the Taskar family members who have purchased the subject land from Petitioners in the year 2005. Prima facie Petitioners have no locus since they have sold the subject land to Respondent Nos.5 and 6. Mr. Gite represents the Petitioners whereas Mr. Chavan espouses the cause of Respondent Nos.5 and 6. Hence Respondent Nos.5 and 6 are the interested parties. Rest of the parties are proforma parties. The facts in the present case are undisputed but are extremely relevant for adjudication of the present lis between the parties. A word of caution needs to be noted herein because all along parties have filed and contested qu