Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Abhay Ahuja, J
Priyanka Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of loan facilities, documentation, and history of alleged default. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 2. arguments for dismissal under order vii rule 11 and maintainability of summary suit. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 3. plaintiff response regarding suit maintainability and arbitration applicability. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 4. court rejection of order vii rule 11 application due to disclosed cause of action. (Para 51) |
| 5. mandatory nature of section 8 arbitration act referrals based on contractual agreements. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 6. disposal of the suit and reference to arbitration. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
ORDER :
1. This Interim Application has been filed by the Applicant/Original Defendants seeking rejection of the plaint in the Commercial Summary Suit No.87 of 2022 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”).
2. The Respondent / Original Plaintiff has filed the present Commercial Summary Suit inter alia seeking a decree against the Applican
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
