Back
Suraj Deepak Mane – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of judicial recruitment channels and the statutory framework under the 2008 rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. the requirement for statutory amendments to be gazetted before becoming enforceable. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. challenge to the procedural fairness and legality of the ongoing recruitment process under articles 14, 16, and 233. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
INDEX
| Sr. No. | Exhibits | Particulars | Page No |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Synopsis | A-D | |
| 2. | Memo Of Petition | 1-24 | |
| 3. | A. | Copy of the Judgement in the case of All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India | 25-52 |
| 4. | B. | Copy of the advertisement | 53-84 |
| 5. | C. | Copy of the earlier advertisement of last three years | 85-142 |
| 6. | D. | Copy of the Judgement in the case of Rejanish K.V. v. K. Deepa & Ors., in Civil Appeal No. 3947 of 2020, decided on 11.03.2026 | 143-239 |
| 7. | E. | Copy of the Corrigendum dated 26.03.2026 | 240 |
| 8. | F. | Copy of the hall ticket instructions dated 05.05.2026 | 241 |
| 9. | G. | Copy of the result and the cut-off list dated 14.05.2026 | 242-284 |
| 10. | H. | Copy of the representation dated 19/05/2026 | 285-291 |
| 11. | I. | Copy of the notification | 292 |
| Last Page No | 292 |
PLACE: MUMBAI
DATE: 9/6/26
ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER
SY
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
