CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTHA ROY CHOWDHURY, J
BAIJNATH CHOUBEY & COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
VINAY CHANDRA DEVIDAS & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reversal of eviction order requires proof of tenancy and parties. (Para 1 , 6) |
| 2. arguments against subletting lack supporting evidence. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. court emphasizes requirement of evidence in proving subletting. (Para 26 , 27) |
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgement and decree passed by learned Judge, 4th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Title Appeal No. 14 of 2018, reversing thereby the judgement and decree dated 27th November, 2017 passed by learned 6th Bench of Presidency Small Causes Court, Calcutta in Ejectment Suit No. 1079 of 2002 as well as order dated 25 th July, 2019, rejecting thereby the cross-objection to the decree.
2. For the sake of convenience the parties will be referred to as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court.
3. Briefly stated, by executing a deed of settlement on 19th February, 1993, one Harak Chand Beljee settles the premises nos. 37, 38 and 39 of Ezra Street, Kolkata-700001 upon the trust. One Baijnath Choubey was inducted as a tenant in respect of three rooms, one showcase on 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.