CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, Justice Uday Kumar, JJ
SHREE SHREE ISWAR SITARAM JEW AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SUBHODEEP GANGULY AND ORS. – Respondent
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:-
1. By virtue of a previous order, the appeal was directed to be heard along with the applications and is now taken up for hearing.
2. The present first miscellaneous appeal arises out of an order refusing to grant ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs/appellants.
3. The genesis of the litigation is a suit bearing Title Suit No. 910 of 2023 filed by the plaintiffs/appellants before the Tenth Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Alipore inter alia for declaration that a deed of sale dated July 2, 2015 executed by one Ruby Ganguly (since deceased) in favour of defendants/respondents no.4 is not binding on the deity, that is, appellant no.1 Shree Shree Iswar Sitaram Jew, for a decree for refund of the amount of Rs.1,75,00,000-/ received by the said Ruby Ganguly to the plaintiffs and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant no. 1 to 4 from giving effect to the impugned deed of conveyance as well as from transferring the suit property and also for a decree for cancellation of the impugned deed for conveyance dated July 2, 2015.
4. In the said suit, an application for temporary and ad interim injunction was filed restraining t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.