Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Shampa Sarkar, J
Unisystem Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Prakash Jhunjhunwala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to court's decision on eviction. (Para 1 , 4 , 13 , 19) |
| 2. proof required for landlord's reasonable need. (Para 2 , 5 , 21) |
| 3. landlord's obligation to prove lack of alternatives. (Para 20 , 22) |
| 4. final ruling on the eviction application. (Para 24) |
1. The revisional application has been filed challenging an order dated September 6, 2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Second Court at Howrah, in Title Suit No.37 of 2012.
2. The opposite party filed a suit for eviction, being Title Suit No.37 of 2012. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit. The petitioner entered appearance in the suit and filed a written statement along with a counter claim.
3. The plaint case was that the defendant/petitioner had been inducted as a monthly tenant in respect of one factory shed bearing No. 1A, having a covered area of more or less 5000 sq. ft. at holding 220A, Naskar Para Road, 2 Ghusuri, Police Station, Malipachghara, District Howrah, at a monthly rental of Rs.5,788.12p, which was lastly enhanced to Rs.6,700.49p. The defendant/petitioner defaulted in payment of the rent sinc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
