CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J
Pawan Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mandatory inquiry under section 202 cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. legal obligations of magistrate under cr.p.c. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 3. exceptions and application of section 202 in certain cases (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. court's final reasoning on due process compliance (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
1. These bunches of criminal revisions have been assigned by the Hon’ble Chief Justice for determination of a common question as to whether an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is mandatory before issuance of process in a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the accused resides outside the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kolkata.
2. The following are the facts of the case:-
C/22365/2011
3. The opposite party No.2 as complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 /141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging, inter alia, that in discharge of existing date and liability the accused No.2 to 4 issued two account payee cheques being No.045737 dated 1st June, 2011 and 045738 dated 16th June, 2011 for Rs. 65 la
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.