Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J
Pawan Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaints under the ni act regarding dishonored cheques. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. mandatory inquiry under section 202 cr.p.c when the accused is outside jurisdiction. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. supreme court stance on inquiries under section 202 in ni act cases. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. the necessity for inquiry to prevent false complaints against distant residents. (Para 18) |
| 5. defense arguments regarding the inquiry conducted by the magistrate. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. assessment of magistrate's compliance with section 202. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
1. These bunches of criminal revisions have been assigned by the Hon’ble Chief Justice for determination of a common question as to whether an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is mandatory before issuance of process in a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the accused resides outside the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kolkata.
2. The following are the facts of the case:-
C/22365/2011
3. The opposite party No.2 as complainant filed a complaint under Sectio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
