2.1.2023 Sl.No.14 Ct.19 sn WPA 25330 of 2022 Henara Khatun Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Mohaimenul Mondal ..for the petitioner Ms. Sipra Majumder Ms. Prativa Ghatak ..for the State The petitioner alleges that the respondent no.9 was illegally selected as Asha under Chanchal Sub Division. According to the petitioner, her performance was better than the said respondent and as such the selection of the respondent No.9 was erroneous.

Documents have been produced by the learned advocate for the State respondents which indicate that 90% weightage was granted to the Madhyamik examination and/or its equivalent and 10% weightage was given to the interview. Distribution of marks have also been provided as hereunder:-

Name of candidate	Total marks (withou t additio nal)	Marks obtained (without additional)	Acad emic weig htage (100 %)	Academic weightage (90%)	Intervi ew weighta ge	Total Marks	Grad ation
Mala Mandal	800	305	38.1 3	34.31	8.2	42.51	1
Henara Khatun	1000	397	39.7 0	35.73	3	38.73	2

As the petitioner got less marks than the selected candidate at the interview, the petitioner secured the second position. There was a single vacancy. It also appears tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document