CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J
Pawan Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of various complaints under n.i. act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. mandatory inquiry under section 202 for out-of-jurisdiction accused. (Para 12 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court's reasoning for inquiry requirements under the n.i. act. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 26 , 28) |
| 4. final decision regarding the lack of merit in revisions. (Para 29) |
1. These bunches of criminal revisions have been assigned by the Hon’ble Chief Justice for determination of a common question as to whether an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is mandatory before issuance of process in a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the accused resides outside the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kolkata.
2. The following are the facts of the case:-
C/22365/2011
3. The opposite party No.2 as complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 /141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging, inter alia, that in discharge of existing date and liability the accused No.2 to 4 issued two account payee cheques being No.045737 dated 1st June, 2011
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.