Supratim Bhattacharya, J.:

1. Both the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate court has declined the relief claimed by the petitioner as regards to the correction of the three sale deeds alleged to have been executed on 19.04.1971, 09.05.1973 and 19.09.1975. It is the plaintiff’s claim that Dag No. 1832 has wrongly been mentioned in these three sale deeds said to have been executed by Haripada Das. According to the plaintiffs the Dag No. 1832 has wrongly been mentioned in place of 1838 therefore they sought for declaration of title in respect of Dag No. 1838 of Schedule A property in the plaint. They also sought for a decree rectifying the three sale deeds being No. 3282 of 19.04.1971, 4848 dated 09.05.1973 and 6126 of 19.09.1975. The brief factual background is that Haripada Das was the original owner of undivided half share in respect of the property being plot No. 1838 situated at Mouja Harembagopalpur JL NO. 195. According to the plaintiff Haripada died intestate leaving behind his wife and one son, defendant No. 1, he also left behind three daughters. Santibala Das the wife of Haripada Das also died intestate, one of the daughters Renukabala Das died leaving behind her husb