DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated January 15, 2025, passed in WPA 16533 of 1989.

2. The appeal is at the behest of the appellants.

3. Learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits that, no acquisition took place in respect of plot no.126. He refers to the impugned order. He submits that, the impugned order proceeds on the basis of an earlier order of the Single Bench dated April 4, 2017, passed in WP 7798 (W) of 2015. He submits that, although the same plot of land was involved, nonetheless, the appellants were not parties to such writ petition. Therefore, the impugned order dated April 4, 2017 is not binding upon the appellants.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits that, so far as the writ petition of the appellants is concerned, being WPA 16533 of 1989, the same was initially disposed of by an order of dismissal. Appeal carried therefrom was disposed of by the Division Bench on August 19, 1993. The Division Bench directed stay of all proceedings in the land acquisition case. He submits that, in view of such stay granted, the acquisition proceedings could attain finality as held by the learned Single Judge.

5. Le