SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 831

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Arijit Banerjee, Om Narayan Rai, JJ
Srijan Realty Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
John Augustine – Respondent


Table of Content
1. initial procedural context and appeal basis. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. plaintiffs sought injunction against construction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. defendants argue lack of jurisdiction for the suit. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. nature of suit impacts court's jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. trustees' obligations to act in trust's interest. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. allegations of fraud regarding property agreements. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
7. financial dealings related to the development agreement. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
8. legal principles regarding property transactions discussed. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
9. delay in action affects plaintiffs' claims. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
10. evidence of payments to trustees discussed. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
11. jurisdictional requirements for the suit outlined. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
12. court's view on the suit's nature and jurisdiction. (Para 34 , 35 , 36)
13. implications of the development agreement analyzed. (Para 37 , 38 , 39)
14. court's stance on the injunction discussed. (Para 40 , 41 , 42)
15. precedents regarding jurisdiction discussed. (Para 43 , 44 , 45)
16. relevance of fraud allegations to jurisdiction. (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
17. procedural rules governing the case ou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top