SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 988

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
NAJAMUL HAQUE SK. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


Sl.No.

13.05.2025

26 WPA 4865 of 2023 Court No. 35 G.S.Das Najamul Haque Sekh -Vs-

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Arif Ali Mr. Sarban Bhattacharjee … for the Petitioner(s)

Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh Mr. Chandra Nath Sarkar … for the respondent no. 5 The petitioner and the private respondents both claim to be the owner of piece and parcel of a land. The petitioner, on the other hand, claims that he intends to construct a boundary wall in terms of a sanction plan. The petitioner, to that effect, referred to an information furnished to the Inspector-in-charge of Joynagar Police Station along with the other administrative authorities dated

05.01.2023.

Having considered that the police authorities would only act pursuant to the directions passed by a court of law or the appropriate authorities under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1950, I am of the view that the police authorities, in this case, would only restrict themselves to the extent that there should not be any violation of any law and order.

However, if any representation(s) is filed either at the behest of the petitioner or the private respondents, the police authorities would ensure that there is no breach of the peace and/or tran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top