28.04.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ct. No. 2 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Sl. No. 32-34 Appellate Side Moumita WPA 5644 of 2025 IA No:CAN 1 of 2025, CAN 2 of 2025 Subhasis Banerjee & Ors.

Vs.

Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank and Ors.

with WPA 4948 of 2025 Kalyani Mal & Ors.

Vs.

Paschim Banga Gramin Bank & Ors.

with WPA 6009 of 2025 Tapas Kumar Khamru Vs.

Paschim Banga Gramin Bank & Ors.

Mr. Indranath Mitra …… for the Petitioner Mr. Baidurya Ghosal …… for the Respondent nos. 1 to 4 In Re:-CAN 1 of 2025 Mr. Indranath Mitra, learned counsel appears for the petitioner.

Mr. Baidurya Ghosal, learned advocate appears for the respondent bank.

This is an application filed by the writ petitioners praying for impleadment of the Chief Manager (HR), BGVB.

Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits on instruction from his clients that his clients have no objection if this addition of party is allowed.

Accordingly, the impleadment as prayed for in CAN 1 of 2025 stands allowed.

The learned advocate on record shall cause the necessary impleadment in the cause title of the original writ petition by putting his signature. The petitioner then shall serve a copy of the amended writ petition upon the said i