SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 1860

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Om Narayan Rai, J
EVERSTRONG SALES PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
BINOD KUMAR MAHIPAL AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Abhrajit Mitra
For the Respondents: Mainak Bose

Om Narayan Rai, J.:-

1. The instant appeal assails an order dated August 11, 2023 passed by the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Rajarhat in Title Suit No. 20 of 2021 (C.C) whereby an application for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter “the Code”) filed by the defendant no. 41 (respondent no. 41 herein) has been allowed.

2. Since we are examining an order whereby an application for rejection of plaint has been allowed, the case run in the plaint only needs to be noticed together with the documents appended thereto. Briefly summed up the plaint case is as follows:

a. The defendant nos. 1 to 32 being in need of funds for the purpose of their business jointly approached the plaintiff for financial assistance to the tune of Rs.7,00,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Crore). The said defendants offered to secure repayment of the loan requested for by them by mortgaging their respective undivided shares in land measuring 394.77 decimals in Baranagar (hereafter “the suit property”).

b. It was specifically agreed between the plaintiff and the defendant nos. 1 to 32 that the said loan sought for by the said defendants would be utilized only for bu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top