Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Jay Sengupta, J
Padma Mondal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for reinvestigation under article 226. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. delay in seeking intervention noted. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on the investigative integrity. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's authority to ensure fair investigation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. indications of biased investigation deliberated. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. need for further investigation by an independent agency. (Para 12 , 13 , 21) |
| 7. decision to transfer investigation to cbi. (Para 28) |
JAY SENGUPTA, J.
1. This an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for reinvestigation of the case in respect of Nazat Police Station Case No. 141 dated 09.06.2019 under Sections under Sections 147 ,148,149, 325, 326, 302, 379, and 427 of the Indian Penal Code , Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act and added Section 3(2)(v) of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, by an independent and specialized agency like the Central Bureau of Investigation.
2. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted as follows. After completion of the Lok Sabha Elections in 2019, miscreants belonging to the ruling party in the state of West Ben
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
