Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Unnamed Judge, J
Reckjoani Gram BasiBrinda – Appellant
Versus
State respondents – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal stems from environmental concerns. (Para 1 , 3 , 8) |
| 2. appellant claims aggrieved status. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court reviews standing under ngt. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. challenge to proceedings indicates need for awareness. (Para 12 , 14 , 19) |
| 5. court remands for fresh consideration. (Para 21 , 23 , 28) |
1. The present appeal arises from an order dated 20th May, 2025 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of the Writ Petition filed by the writ petitioners/respondents herein being WPA 10540 of 2025, directing inter alia the police authority to keep surveillance at the subject premises and also to ensure that the writ petitioners are not obstructed or any untoward incidents result therefrom due to their continuation of work.
2. The appellant herein was not a party to the Writ Petition in which the order impugned was passed. The appellant has thus preferred an application CAN 1 of 2025 seeking leave to prefer an appeal against the impugned order and judgment of 20th May 2025.
3. The brief facts necessary for disposing of the matter may be summarised as under:
A. The appellant represents an association of persons known as the “Reckjoani Gram BasiBrinda”.
B. The grie
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
