Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Apurba Sinha Ray, J
Sumit Roy – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing proceedings requires cognizable offense establishment. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments centered on insufficiency of fir allegations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes necessity of clear allegations in fir. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. discretion must be exercised to avoid abuse of process. (Para 7) |
| 5. final decision to dispose of application without quashing. (Para 8) |
CAV On : 14.07.2025 Judgment On : 29.07.2025 Apurba Sinha Ray, J. :-
1. The instant revisional application has been filed by the appellant for quashing of the proceeding in connection with GR Case No. 1569 of 2003 arising out of Madhyamgram P.S. Case No. 381 of 2023 dated 16.06.2023 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and all orders passed in connection with the aforesaid proceedings pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Barasat, North 24 Parganas.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Ahmed has submitted that the petitioner married the respondent no. 2, eighteen years ago but without any rhyme and reason the relevant police case was filed by the respondent no. 2 against the petitioner and her mother under section 498A of Indian Penal Code . It is a settled principle of la
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
