CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J
ABDUL RASHID – Appellant
Versus
BIDHAN DE SARKAR & ANR. – Respondent
The Court: In a suit for specific performance of two development agreements both dated 25th October, 2025 by which the plaintiff/petitioner agreed to develop two different immovable properties respectively situate and lying at premises No.42C, Serpentine Lane, P.O. Entally, P.S. Muchipara, Kolkata- 700 014 measuring about 4 cottahs 4 chittacks and 15 sq.ft. and at premises No.42D, Serpentine Lane, P.O. Entally, P.S. Muchipara, Kolkata- 700 014 measuring about 1 cottah 3 chittacks and 15 sq.ft. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the ‘said properties’), this application, inter alia, for injunction has been made.
The matter appears to have a chequered history. The suit was initially filed in 2023 in the commercial division of this Court and was number as CS/213/2023. In the said suit, on the allegation that the development agreements have been terminated on 1st September, 2020, the plaintiff had filed an interlocutory application being GA/1/2023. The ad interim order of injunction was refused on the ground that the plaintiff/petitioner was protected under the provisions of Sections 52 and 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (hereinafter referred to as ‘said Act’) as the pla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.