SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 1998

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SHAMPA SARKAR, J
EASTERN INDIA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ANAMIKA LODHA AND ORS. – Respondent
CS/153/2024 | CS/155/2024 | CS/156/2024 | CS/159/2024 | CS/164/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Mr. Anirban Ray, Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Mr. Naman Choudhury, Mr. Subhrajyoti Mukherjee, Mr. Debartha Chakraborty, Ms. Rajshree Mukherjee, Ms. Siddhi Agarwal
For the Respondents: Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Mr. Sayan Roy Chowdhury, Mr. Satyaki Mukherjee, Mr. Bhavesh Garodia, Mr. Navneet Misra

The judgment reaffirms procedural validity of petitions filed by institutional appellants against a common respondent, emphasizing existing judicial authority.

Headnote:This judgment concerns various applications related to CS/153/2024 among others, involving educational institutions and a respondent concerning legal disputes regarding institutional authority and affiliations. The court examines the procedural validity of submitted petitions and interveners, ultimately asserting the relevancy of existing judicial precedents in ruling the outcomes during the scheduled hearing on July 29, 2025.

…for Pradip Tandon & Asim Chattopadhyay The Court: Hearing of these matters will continue on 29th July, 2025 at 12 noon.

(SHAMPA SARKAR, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top