SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2226

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J
MITHU RANI MURMU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction | W.P.A. NO 15294 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ujjal Ray, Mr. Atreya Chakraborty
For the Respondents: Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Ms. Sangeeta Roy

Educational qualifications acquired after appointment can entitle a teacher to a higher pay scale under certain conditions provided by statute.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) (Amendment) Act, 2016 - Section 3(4) - Claim for higher pay scale - Petitioner, appointed as Assistant Teacher, seeks post-graduate scale of pay following completion of higher studies - Denied by respondents citing misinterpretation of the Act - Court holds that Honours degree can be treated as minimum qualification for the post and entitles the petitioner to post graduate scale of pay, setting aside the denial. (Paras 4, 9, 10, 11, 12)

(B) Principle of Allowing Pay Scale upon Qualifying - The court ruled that when permitted by authority, the applicant's enhanced qualifications must be duly recognized in pay scales. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher with an Honours degree and had obtained a post-graduate degree thereafter. She was denied the corresponding pay scale despite being permitted to pursue higher studies.

Findings of Court:
The decision to deny post graduate scale showed non-application of mind and was overturned by the court, directing payment to commence from the date of her result.

Issues: Whether an increment or higher scale of pay can be claimed under Section 3(4) based on qualifications acquired after appointment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that upon fulfilling qualifications relevant to their post under the Act, teachers should not be deprived of benefits arising from subsequent educational achievements.

Result: Petitioner's claim for post graduate scale of pay granted from the date of final results.

Table of Content
1. history of petitioner's appointment and qualifications. (Para 8)
2. court's justification for granting scale of pay. (Para 9 , 10 , 12)
3. court's decision based on statutory interpretation. (Para 11)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA For the Petitioner : Mr. Ujjal Ray Mr. Atreya Chakraborty For the State : Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Ld. AGP Ms. Sangeeta Roy Heard on : 14.08.2025 Judgment on : 14.08.2025 SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.:

1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

2. Petitioner having Honours graduate degree in Nutrition subject was recommended vide memo dated 16th June, 2011 for being appointed as Assistant Teacher in higher secondary section in Midnapore Town School (HS), Paschim Medinipur (hereinafter referred to as “said school”). Pursuant to such recommendation dated 16th June, 2011 petitioner joined the post of Assistant Teacher on 25th July, 2011 and the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Paschim Medinipur being respondent no. 4 accorded approval of appointment vide memo dated 29th September, 2011. Initially petitioner was appointed for a period of two years and thereafter petitioner was retained substantively vide memo dated 22nd April, 2014 issued by respondent no.4 as an Assistant Teacher in said school. Petitioner at the time of appointment was possessing Honours graduate degree and was sanctioned Honours graduate scale of pay. Petitioner made prayer through said school authority for enrolling herself with Vidyasagar University for undergoing higher course of study in order to obtain post graduate qualification in Nutrition. On scrutiny respondent no. 4 granted prior permission permitting the petitioner to undergo higher course of study in terms of Government Order dated 27th November, 2007. Petitioner completed higher course of study and obtained post graduate degree in Nutrition and thereafter prayer was made before respondent no. 4 for sanction of post graduate scale of pay.

3. Respondent no. 4 by issuing memo dated 24th September, 2024 rejected the prayer of the petitioner seeking grant of post graduate scale of pay and said memo dated 24th September, 2024 is questioned by presenting this writ petition.

4. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits in terms of Section 3(4) of the West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) (Amendment) Act, 2016 [for short, “said Act of 2016] she is entitled to enjoy post graduate scale of pay and respondent no. 4 misreading relevant provisions of said Act of 2016 denied right of the petitioner to receive post graduate scale of pay.

5. State respondents are represented by Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, learned Additional Government Pleader, who has made submission to defend the decision of respondent no. 4 whereby petitioner was refused to get the benefit of post graduate scale of pay.

6. It is strenuously argued by Mr. Mukherjee that Section 3(4) of the said Act of 2016 stipulates that the concerned teacher is not entitled to claim any additional increment or higher scale of pay for any qualification other than the minimum qualification specified for such post and in the present case since at the time of appointment of the petitioner she was possessing Honours graduate qualification same needs to be treated as minimum qualification. As such, petitioner is not entitled to receive post graduate scale of pay by enhancing her educational qualification subsequent to appointment.

7. For better understanding of the issue involved in this writ petition, Section 3(4) of the said Act of 2016 is quoted below:-

for sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be substituted :-

“(4)

be entitled to draw pay meant for Post-graduate “(3) Every teacher appointed for classes XI and XII, shall qualification and shall not be entitled to claim any additional increment or higher scale of pay for any qualification other than the minimum qualification specified for such post.

8. In the pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top