CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Subhendu Samanta, J
Pranab Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Paramita Mandal – Respondent
The instant Civil Revision has been preferred against an order dated 23rd of June, 2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), 10th Court, Alipore, Dist.-24-Parganas (South) in Money Suit 15 of 2014.
The brief fact of the matter is that during the pendency of the suit the plaintiff, namely, Paramita Mondal filed an application for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC; in the said application from page one to the last page, the name and the signature of the deponent appears to be as “Paramita Dutta”. In the affidavit portion of the said application the name of the plaintiff is appearing as Paromita Mondal. Present petitioner being the defendant after receiving such application has filed an application before the learned Trial Court under Section 151 CPC, containing, inter alia, that the application for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 was not filed by the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s signature was forged which tantamount to a criminal offence. Defendant intend to initiate a proceeding of forjury under Section 340 of IPC and prayed that the petition under Order 6 Rule 17 be kept in the safe custody to justify the forge and false signature of the plaintiff. A written objection was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.