With CAN 1 of 2025 For the Appellants : Mr. Kumar Jyoti Tewari, Sr. Adv., Mr. Panchanan Hajra Mr. Amrit Sinha Mr. Aniruddha Tewari For the WBSETCL : Mr. Sumit Kumar Panja Mr. Sumit Roy For the State : Mr. K.J. Yusuf, Ld. A.G.P., Ms. Munmun Ganguly Heard & Judgment on : August 13, 2025 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. Appeal is directed against an order dated January 14, 2025 passed in WP.P.A. 23456 of 2024.

2. Appeal is at the behest of the writ petitioners.

3. By the impugned order, learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition by permitting the appellants to produce proof of damage, if any sustained by the appellants due to drawing of the high tension line over his plot of land.

4. Learned senior advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the appellants owned 6 decimal of land. High tension line was taken over the plot belonging to the appellants by the Transmission Company. He submits that the high tension line was drawn in deviation by the original plan.

5. Learned senior advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the deviation was made in order to give an advantage to a liquor shop located at an adjacent plot of land. He submits that by reason of the high tension line, ap