Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Bivas Pattanayak, J
Syed Mosharaf Hossain – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's observations on the lack of compliance by state authorities. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 2. potential loss of retirement benefits due to lack of timely appointment. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. granting notional benefits from the date of initial appointment. (Para 11) |
| 4. final decision and directive for compliance. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. Supplementary Affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks direction upon the respondents to grant notional benefits to the petitioner from the date i.e. 31st August, 2007 on which initial appointment letters were issued to the successful candidates.
3. The petitioner contends that the petitioner, upon being sponsored by the employment exchange against the vacancies under the different panchayat samities in the district of Bardhaman in the year 2005, appeared in a written test held on 8th January, 2006. After qualifying in the written test, the petitioner was called for interview for appointment to the post of „Panchayat Karmee‟ on 13th July, 2007. The petitioner stood first in the panel prepared for the purpose of appointment as a Gram Panchayat Karmee under Ausgram-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
