SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2356

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Smita Das De, J
Sumana Bandyopadhyay – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: None

Dictated by Smita Das De, J.

1. None appears for the respective parties.

2. The instant Public Interest Litigation has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for the following relief(s):-

“a) A writ of/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to initiate appropriate action against the private respondent for his statements uttered in public meeting reproduced in paragraph 5 of the writ petition;

b) A writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to lodge First Information Report against the private respondent under punishable under Sections 153(b), 295(a), 298 and 505 of the Indian Penal Code for the words uttered in a public meeting reproduced in paragraph 5 of the writ petition;

c) A writ in the nature of Certiorari calling upon the respondents to certify and transmit all the records of this case to this Hon’ble Court and conscionable justice may be done by taking appropriate steps against the private respondent;

d) Pass appropriate order and/or orders and/or direction and/or directions;

e) Rule NISI in terms of prayers above;

f) Pass an interim order directing the respondents to show-cause as to why till date no steps have been taken against the respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top