IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Shampa Sarkar, J.
The State of West Bengal and Ors. – Applicants
Versus
M/S B B M Enterprise – Respondent
IA No. GA-COM 4 of 2024 In A.P - 808 of 2022
Decided On : 19-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts related to the award and proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. further directions requested. (Para 5) |
| 3. grounds for seeking cash security. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. prerequisites for stay of enforcement. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. arguments on adequacy of the deposit. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. cites supporting decisions related to cash security. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. further references to case law. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. arguments against modification of previous orders. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. court's analysis and interpretations. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 10. legal framework discussion. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 11. discussion on judicial precedents. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 12. court's retentive jurisdiction over conditions. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 13. discussion on withdrawal rights. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 14. concluding arguments for equity. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 15. definitions of rights and obligations. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 16. final observations and orders. (Para 45 , 46) |
| 17. culmination of cash security determination. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 18. final deliberations on case law. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 19. final orders and directions given. (Para 57) |
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Sarkar, J.
1. GA-COM/4/2024 is an application seeking deposit of additional cash security by the award debtors for the remainder of the awarded amount together with accrued interest as on December 31, 2023. The award holder is the applicant. The dues calculated as per the award as on 31st December, 2023 stood at Rs. 5,32,80,181/-.
2. The dispute between the parties was that, the award debtor did not pay the bills raised by the applicant, despite complete execution of the work. The award holder invoked arbitration under clause 25 of the conditions of the contract. A statement of claim was filed before the learned Arbitrator and upon considering the facts and circumstances, the learned Arbitrator passed the award on July 2, 2022.
3. The award debtors filed an application for setting aside the award. The applicant filed an execution case seeking enforcement of the award vide EC No. 12 of 2023, on January 5, 2023. Immediately thereafter, the award debtors moved an application under Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) on January 17, 2023. Before a predecessor Judge, the award debtors submitted that, they were willing to deposit Rs. 9 crores within a period of six weeks before the Registrar Original Side, High Court at Calcutta. Accordingly, an order was passed, staying the enforceability of the award. However, the award debtors failed to deposit the money within time. By order dated March 14, 2023, the time for deposit of the money was extended. On March 16, 2023, the award holder was informed that the money had been deposited. Accordingly, a prayer was made for withdrawal of the money. The award holder contended that, for the purpose of execution of the subject contract, a loan had been obtained from the Punjab National Bank. The award holder failed to repay the debt as per the repayment schedule of the bank. A notice under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) was issued on February 17, 2021. It was also stated that the business had suffered on account of the Covid pandemic and substantial amount of money was required for survival of the business and repayment of the bank’s dues. The award holder was hoping to repay the amount from the awarded sum, but on account of the stay, the money did not pass to the award holder.
4. The application was allowed by order dated July 25, 2023. The Court allowed withdrawal of the sum deposited with a condition for securing the amount by a personal bank guarantee. Another application, i.e., G.A No. 2 of 2023 was filed on July 28, 2023, for addition of the name of the Punjab National Bank, Keyatala Branch, Kolkata. The application was allowed, and the order dated July 25, 2023 was modified on July 28, 2023.
Pam Developments Private Limited vs State of West Bengal
Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited vs Governor State of Orissa
The court clarified that award debtors must deposit the full awarded sum as a condition for staying enforcement, emphasizing that both public and private parties are subject to the same requirements ....
The court has discretion to modify security arrangements under the Arbitration Act based on changed circumstances, balancing equities between parties while allowing withdrawal of funds.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretion of the court to direct the petitioner to furnish security on the full arbitral award and the impact of the Arbitration and Conciliat....
power enshrined under Section 151 of the Code can be exercised if there is no express provision contained in the Code or the Special Act.
The court ruled that a full deposit of the arbitral award amount is mandatory before granting a stay under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The pendency of an application under Section 34 of the A&C Act is no longer a bar for enforcement of an arbitral award. The court must hear the application under Section 34 of the A&C Act on its meri....
Non-compliance with court directions for deposit can result in the dismissal of a challenge to an arbitral award.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.