CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J
Mozzammel Hossain Mallik @ Mojammel Mollicik & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Nabab Laskar & Anr. – Respondent
Mr. Debasis Mitra Ms. Priya Chakraborty Ms. Debashri Bose …for the petitioners Mr. Animesh Paul Ms. Manisha Kr. Upadhyay ….for the opposite parties This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendants and is directed against an order dated July 1, 2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Howrah in Miscellaneous Appeal No.217 of 2022.
The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned trial judge refused to pass any ad interim order of injunction in favour of the opposite party but the learned judge of the Appellate Court passed an order of status quo with regard to the suit property in spite of the fact that the opposite party failed to produce any document in support of their possession in spite of the suit property. The learned advocate further submits that in the meantime the petitioner has already transferred the suit property in favour of the third party and such third party has independent suit being Title Suit No.486 of 2023 and has obtained an order of injunction against the opposite parties herein.
Heard the learned advocate for the opposite parties on such submission.
The opposite parties herein fil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.