Adv. Debojit Kundu … for the defacto-complainant On prayer of the petitioner, leave is granted to correct the prayer portion of the application.

The petitioner has assailed the orders dated 28^th February, 2025, 13^th March, 2025, 21^st March, 2025 and 10^th April, 2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalpaiguri in G.R.

case no. 5460 of 2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

It appears that warrant of arrest was issued by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalpaiguri against the petitioners on 28^th January, 2025. The learned Magistrate has recorded in the order dated 28^th February, 2025 that no E/R of WA was received in respect of the petitioners. The same fact was also recorded in the order dated 13th March, 2025. Surprisingly, in the order dated 21st March, 2025 the learned Magistrate recorded receipt of proclamation upon service of the same to the petitioners and other co-accused. Warrant of attachment was also issued by the same order. Again, the order dated 10^th April, 2025 records that no E/R of W/P was received in respect of the petitioners and others. The Magistrate was of the view that warrant of proclamation would soon become effective and issued warr