PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J. : –

1. The affidavit of service as filed today on behalf of the writ petitioner is taken on record.

2. The writ petitioner and the respondents State are represented by their respective learned advocates.

3. By filing the instant writ petition, the writ petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs against the respondent authorities, more specifically against the respondent no.2 for quashing and/or setting aside the order dated 07.05.2025 whereby and whereunder the writ petitioner’s application for renewal of the period of lease was not considered favourably.

4. In course of hearing, Mr. Bandyopadhyay, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner at the very outset draws attention of this court to page no.36 of the instant writ petition being a copy of the grant of long term mining lease dated 07.03.2013 as granted in favour of the writ petitioner.

5. Drawing attention to page no.46 of the instant writ petition, it is submitted by Mr. Bandyopadhyay that such lease deed dated 02.05.2019 was executed in favour of the writ petitioner for quarry of black stone from the relevant plot. It is submitted by Mr. Bandyopadhyay that Clause