SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2617

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J
UCO Bank – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction WPA 12532 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Anniruddha Saha Roy, Mr. Sourjya Roy
For the Respondent No. 4: Mr. Subhas Chandra Sarkar

The court affirmed that gratuity calculations under officers' regulations may exceed statutory limits provided by the Payment of Gratuity Act, emphasizing adherence to predefined compensatory structures.

Headnote:(A) Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Calculation of gratuity under OSR 1979 vs. Payment of Gratuity Act - Claim for additional gratuity made five years post-retirement, with the appellant contesting the calculation method of the gratuity claim. The appellate authority correctly interpreted the officer's regulations boosting the gratuity payable. (Paras 7, 9, 12)

(B) Jurisdiction and power of appellate authority - Courts exercise caution in overturning administrative determinations unless glaring errors occur, and the appeals must show substantial deviation to warrant interference. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The banking company challenged an order determining the gratuity payable to a former employee claiming a total beyond what was initially provided. The appellate authority recalculated based on predefined parameters set forth in previous regulations.

Findings of Court:
The appellate authority's calculation was accurate and according to law, reinforcing benefits against statutory limits.

Issues: The principal issues revolved around the accurate calculation of gratuity according to the officer’s service regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld that where regulations are in place providing more substantial benefits than statutory requirements, those should dictate the calculations. The appellate authority's revised figures aligned with legal provisions.

Result: WPA 12532 of 2025 stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to gratuity payment based on regulatory interpretation. (Para 1 , 9)
2. details of employment duration and payment history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's refusal to overturn the appellate authority's accurate calculations. (Para 12 , 13)

For the Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Subhas Chandra Sarkar Hearing concluded on : 22.07.2025 Judgment on : 04.08.2025 Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.:

1. The writ application has been preferred challenging the order dated

31.10.2023 passed by the respondent no. 2, the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Kolkata and the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and further the order dated 17.03.2025 passed by respondent no. 3, the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) Kolkata and the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 .

2. The petitioner’s case is that it is a banking company and a nationalized bank operating within India.

3. The petitioner states that the employee being the respondent no. 4 herein joined the service of the petitioner Bank on 01.10.1980 and superannuated on 31.07.2016 after serving for a period of 34 years and 09 months and 30 days.

4. It is further stated that the service of the respondent No. 4 was governed by the UCO Bank (Officers’) Service Regulation, 1979 and upon superannuation the respondent No. 4 was paid gratuity in terms of the said Regulations to the tune of Rs. 11,48,106.66/-. It is further stated that the ceiling limit under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 as on 31.07.2016 was Rs. 10 lakhs. Therefore, the respondent No. 4 was paid gratuity in better terms than that of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 .

5. The respondent No. 4 accepted such gratuity without any demur or reservations whatsoever.

6. The respondent No. 4, after a lapse of about 5 years from the date of his retirement applied for additional gratuity before the Bank in Form-I dated 31.08.2021, claiming gratuity to the tune of Rs. 15,01,038 and ultimately filed a claim before the respondent No. 2 in Form-N dated 21.09.2021.

7. The respondent no. 2 being the Controlling Authority, on hearing the parties determined the gratuity as per OSR which is as follows:-

DETERMINATION OF GRATUITY AS PER OSR Through discussion, in a nutshell, it is apparent that the calculation of the gratuity for service rendered by the applicant in the opponent’s establishment should be based on the last salary drawn, including DA and special allowance. Hence, the determination of gratuity is given below.

1. Date of appointment: 01-10-1980

2. Date of superannuation: 31-07-2016

3. Length of service rendered: 34 Years, 09 months & 30 days. .

(i.e. 35 years as per section 4 (2) of the PG Act.)

Last wages drawn.

a) Basic pay = 64270.00 b) Dearness Allowance = 26993.40 c) Fixed Personal Pay (FPP) = 1650.00 d) Professional Qualification Pay (PQP) = 00.00 e) Special Allowance = 6427.00 f) Special Allowance with DA = 2699.34 Total Salary Wages = 102039.74 Gratuity payable as per P.G. Act = 2060417.82 (Last wages drawn x 15/26x Length of Service)

Subject to maximum limit gratuity payable: = (Ten lakh only)

1. Amount of Gratuity payable as per OSR, 1979 (a) Up to 30 years (102039.74x 15) = 1530596.10 (b) Above 30 years (102039.74/2 X 5) = 255099.35 Total (a+b) = 1785695.45

2. Amount of Gratuity already paid = 1148070.00

3. Differential amount of gratuity to be paid = 637625.45 The issue of the ceiling limit of payable gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act does not arise in this case because the applicant has chosen to pay gratuity under the officer’s regulations. As a result, the gratuity ceiling will not be applicable because the applicant is entitled to a higher gratuity if the same is found to be higher. The payment of gratuity in officers’ regulations shall be made if the aforesaid calculation is higher.

ORDER

The application is allowed in the circumstances mentioned above and I hereby direct the non-applicant to pay the balance amount of gratuity amounting to Rs.637625.45

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top