Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J
UCO Bank – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to gratuity payment based on regulatory interpretation. (Para 1 , 9) |
| 2. details of employment duration and payment history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's refusal to overturn the appellate authority's accurate calculations. (Para 12 , 13) |
For the Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Subhas Chandra Sarkar Hearing concluded on : 22.07.2025 Judgment on : 04.08.2025 Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.:
1. The writ application has been preferred challenging the order dated
31.10.2023 passed by the respondent no. 2, the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Kolkata and the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and further the order dated 17.03.2025 passed by respondent no. 3, the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) Kolkata and the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 .
2. The petitioner’s case is that it is a banking company and a nationalized bank operating within India.
3. The petitioner states that the employee being the respondent no. 4 herein joined the service of the petitioner Bank on 01.10.1980 and superannuated on 31.07.2016 after serving for a period of 34 years and 09 months and 30 days.
4. It is further stated that th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
