Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Uday Kumar, J
Shri Ramji Tewari – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing based on procedural errors in a pending criminal case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal grounds cited against the proceedings include limitation, omission, and insufficient specificity. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court addresses the validity of prosecution considering procedural aspects and substantive law. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. the judgment concludes with the allowance of crr, quashing the proceedings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
UDAY KUMAR, J.: –
Introduction:
1. The petitioner, Shri Ramji Tewari, the Principal General Manager of the BSNL Telecom Factory has approached this Court invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, sought for the quashing of the criminal proceedings initiated against him in Complaint Case No. C-185 of 2022, currently pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas. The petitioner is the sole accused, a fact that lies at the heart of this dispute.
2. The complaint, based on an inspection conducted by the Labour Enforcement Officer, Respondent No. 2, on August 19, 2021, alleged certain
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
