Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Partha Sarathi Sen, J
Ramanuj Enterprise – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. administrative actions do not show undue delay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. application for leasing not acted upon by authorities. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. previous lease applications become ineligible under new rules. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 4. rules clarifying ineligibility due to new legislative framework. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. no legal errors in the authority's decision. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. granted liberty for refund requests. (Para 16 , 17) |
1. The affidavit of service as filed today on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent State has filed a brief history as prepared by the jurisdictional Additional District Magistrate i.e. the respondent no.6 herein.
3. Let the brief history as filed on behalf of the respondent State be taken on record.
4. The subject matter of the instant writ petitioner is the order dated 03.06.2023 as passed by the respondent no.6/authority whereby and whereunder the respondent no.6/authority declines to consider the representation of the writ petitioner favourably.
5. In course of his submission, Mr. Dan, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner submits before this court that from the materia
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
