Mr. Soumya Banerjee Ms. Monalisa Das Ms. Sucheta Banerjee …for the petitioner Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee Mr. Souvik Das Mr. Rudranil Das …for the opposite party This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff and is directed against order no. 75 dated December 20, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division) 1^st Court, Contai, Purba Medinipur in Title Suit No. 217 of 2014. By the order impugned the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code for amendment of the plaint stood rejected.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner sought to disclose certain deeds by way of amendment. He further submits that the proposed amendments are necessary for the purpose of deciding the real controversies between the parties.

Heard Mr. Mukherjee learned advocate appearing for the opposite party on such submission. He submits that on previous occasion the application for amendment of plaint was allowed but the plaintiff failed to comply with the previous orders of the court. He submits that the application for amendment was filed after the commencement of trial without any explanation as to why