1. The application being CAN 1 of 2022 has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 153 days in filing the appeal.

2. Sufficient grounds have been made out in the instant application explaining such delay. Hence, the delay is condoned.

3. Accordingly, CAN 1 of 2022 is allowed.

Re.: CAN 2 of 2022

4. The application being CAN 2 of 2022 is an application for impleading the auction purchaser of the property from the bank namely Pradip Bhakat.

5. Since the auction purchaser’s interest i.e. Pradip Bhakat, is vitally interlinked to this proceeding, he is a necessary party to this appeal.

6. Let Pradip Bhakat be impleaded as a party respondent to the instant proceeding.

7. Accordingly, CAN 2 of 2022 is allowed.

Re.: CAN 4 of 2023

8. The application being CAN 4 of 2023 is an application for substitution of Reshmi Bhagat instead and in place of Pradip Bhagat, who stated to be died during the pendency of the appeal.

9. Let Reshmi Bhagat be substituted in place of the deceased Pradip Bhagat, original auction purchaser from the bank.

10. Liberty is granted to the advocate on record to substitute Reshmi Bhagat in place and instead of Pradip Bhagat, the original auction purchaser from the bank.

11. Abateme