Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Rajasekhar Mantha, Ajay Kumar Gupta, JJ
TAPAN KUMAR DEY – Appellant
Versus
MUNMUN BANERJEE and OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. inspection led to the identification of unauthorized structures. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. writ petitions challenging demolition orders confirmed the necessity of such actions. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. claims regarding historical constructions were not substantiated. (Para 8 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. court emphasized the abuse of process in misleading submissions. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. court ordered immediate action for the demolition of unauthorized structures. (Para 18 , 22 , 23) |
1st July, 2025 In the High Court at Calcutta Item no.DL 5 Court No. 13 Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) Appellate Side Case No. MAT 512 of 2025 with CAN 1 of 2025 In the matter of :
TAPAN KUMAR DEY …. Appellant VS.
MUNMUN BANERJEE and OTHERS ….Respondents For the Appellant :
Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Senior Advocate Mrs. Amrita Panja Moulick Ms. Shivangi Agarwal ….Advocates For the Respondent nos. 1 to 25 :
Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee Mr. Aurin Chakraborty Ms. Debjani Sengupta ….Advocates For the Respondent no.30 :
Mr. Saptarsi Banerjee Mr. Amal Kumar Saha Mr. Iresh Paul Mr. Shivam Debnath ….Advocates For the Respondent / Howrah Municipal Corporation :
Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Ankit Sureka ….Advocates
1. The original
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
