SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2782

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Rajasekhar Mantha, Ajay Kumar Gupta, JJ
TAPAN KUMAR DEY – Appellant
Versus
MUNMUN BANERJEE and OTHERS – Respondent
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction MAT 512 of 2025 with CAN 1 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, Mrs. Amrita Panja Moulick, Ms. Shivangi Agarwal
For the Respondents: Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Mr. Aurin Chakraborty, Ms. Debjani Sengupta, Mr. Saptarsi Banerjee, Mr. Amal Kumar Saha, Mr. Iresh Paul, Mr. Shivam Debnath, Mr. Sandipan Banerjee, Mr. Ankit Sureka

Court upheld the necessity of demolishing unauthorized structures despite claims of historical significance due to misleading assertions of the club.

Headnote:(A) Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Section 177(5) - Demolition of unauthorized structures - The HMC’s inspection report confirmed unauthorized constructions on designated premises - The appellant/club undertook to self-demolish but failed to do so, prompting intervention by the court - Allegations of a temple's historical existence were dismissed as unfounded. (Paras 1, 4, 10, 12, 18)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Applications - The court found the respondents abused the judicial process with misleading submissions - The court rejected the request for affidavits, stating existing records sufficed for the decision. (Paras 16, 17)

Facts of the case:
The appellant sought demolition of unauthorized constructions identified by the HMC; previous orders were dismissed, and a club's claim of historical construction was deemed unfounded.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered immediate demolition of all unauthorized structures and directed police to assist in enforcement as necessary.

Issues: The case centered on the legitimacy of structures on the properties in question and the club's failure to adhere to court guidance regarding demolition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the club's claims regarding a temple were fabricated to obstruct legal proceedings, necessitating HMC's action without hesitation.

Result: Appeal allowed, prior orders set aside.

Table of Content
1. inspection led to the identification of unauthorized structures. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. writ petitions challenging demolition orders confirmed the necessity of such actions. (Para 5 , 6 , 9)
3. claims regarding historical constructions were not substantiated. (Para 8 , 12 , 14)
4. court emphasized the abuse of process in misleading submissions. (Para 16 , 17)
5. court ordered immediate action for the demolition of unauthorized structures. (Para 18 , 22 , 23)

1st July, 2025 In the High Court at Calcutta Item no.DL 5 Court No. 13 Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) Appellate Side Case No. MAT 512 of 2025 with CAN 1 of 2025 In the matter of :

TAPAN KUMAR DEY …. Appellant VS.

MUNMUN BANERJEE and OTHERS ….Respondents For the Appellant :

Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Senior Advocate Mrs. Amrita Panja Moulick Ms. Shivangi Agarwal ….Advocates For the Respondent nos. 1 to 25 :

Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee Mr. Aurin Chakraborty Ms. Debjani Sengupta ….Advocates For the Respondent no.30 :

Mr. Saptarsi Banerjee Mr. Amal Kumar Saha Mr. Iresh Paul Mr. Shivam Debnath ….Advocates For the Respondent / Howrah Municipal Corporation :

Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Ankit Sureka ….Advocates

1. The original writ petition being WPA 4689 of 2022 (Tapan Kumar Dey Vs. The HMC & Ors.) was filed seeking demolition of unauthorized structures situated at 69 & 71, Kashinath Chatterjee Lane, Shibpur, Howrah – 711102.

2. The Single Bench by the order dated 25th March, 2022 disposed of the writ petition directing the Howrah Municipal Corporation (for short, “HMC”) to conduct an inspection of the premises and the unauthorized construction and to take steps in accordance with law. Accordingly, a report dated 21st April, 2022 was prepared in which it was found by the HMC that a large number of unauthorized structures both old and new were existing on the said premises. It was also found that a deity of Lord Shiva (a shivlinga) which was not there when „stop work‟ notice was issued, was placed at the premises of an unauthorized club house structure, before the date for a joint inspection.

3. Prior to the construction of the new structures, the open land was being used as a playground and the unauthorized old structure in the form of a club house was existing thereat most likely since the year 1986.

4. The HMC, pursuant to the said report dated 21st April, 2022 (supra) directed demolition of the unauthorized structures under the provisions of Section 177 (5) of the Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 vide its order dated 24th June, 2022.

5. Challenging the order of demolition, a local Club called Shibpur Nimtala Sporting Club (the club)

filed a writ petition being WPA 13133 of 2022.

6. Another Single Bench by order dated 26th July, 2022, dismissed the writ petition finding no reason to interfere with the order of the HMC dated 24th June, 2022 (supra).

7. On an appeal against the said order dated 26th July, 2022 being MAT 1306 of 2022, the Club offered to demolish the unauthorized construction on its own. The Club was permitted by order dated 26th November, 2024 eight weeks time to self-demolish the unauthorized construction indicated in the order dated 21st April, 2022 (supra). The appeal was accordingly disposed of.

8. The HMC, at the behest of an order dated 2nd January, 2024 passed in the said appeal, had submitted a report dated 7th February, 2024 indicating that both old and new structures on the said premises were completely unauthorized.

9. The Division Bench of this Court by its order dated

26th November, 2024 (supra) had therefore clearly found that the appellant / Club therein had accepted unauthorized construction on the said premises and had agreed to self-demolish the same. There was a rider attached that in the event, the writ petitioners / Club therein did not effect demolition as undertaken, the HMC would be at liberty to effect demolition of all unauthorized construction thereat.

10. Lo and behold a 3rd writ petition being WP 5887 of

2025 is filed by the wife

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top