SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2816

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J
ANIL KUMAR PATODIA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR PATODIA AND ORS. – Respondent
CS/338/2013



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sarvapriya Mukherjee, Ms. Vedika Kedia
For the Respondents: Mr. Nirmalya Dasgupta, Mr. R. L. Mitra, Ms. Priyanka Dhar, Mr. Arindam Paul, Ms. Sohini Choudhury

The court ordered the adjournment of multiple interim applications, highlighting procedural requirements for submissions and scheduling.

Headnote:This judgment addresses several interim applications in case CS/338/2013 concerning the parties' ongoing disputes. The court noted that the submissions by the plaintiff are still to be concluded and thus adjourned the matter for further proceedings. The essential issue presented pertains to the scheduling of hearing multiple interim applications related to the original case. Ultimately, the court mandated that these matters be listed together for the forthcoming hearing on the specified date.

… for the defendant nos. 12 to 17 The Court:- Learned Advocates for the parties are present.

As submission is yet to be concluded by the plaintiff by filing written notes of arguments, the matters stand adjourned till 17th July, 2025.

Let this matter appear under the same heading.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top