SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2906

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Jay Sengupta, J
Chitra Bandyopadhyay – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
WPA 10353 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Debjani Sengupta, Ms. Koyel Bag
For the Respondents: Ms. Jhuma Chakraborty, Ms. Munmun Tewary

The ruling affirmed entitlement to House Rent Allowance pending appeal outcomes, reflecting adherence to prior judicial determinations.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner, an approved Headmistress, sought the release of House Rent Allowance based on a previous court ruling quashing a detrimental memorandum by the finance department. The core findings affirmed that the petitioner is entitled to HRA despite an ongoing appeal regarding the quashed memorandum. The court directed the respondent to release HRA with interest within six weeks, conditional upon the pending appeal's outcome. The court emphasized alignment with similar precedents to extend the relief sought.

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims entitlement to resumed hra payments. (Para 1 , 3 , 5)
2. state contests validity pending appeal. (Para 4)
3. court aligns with past rulings on hra. (Para 6)
4. court grants hra payment direction. (Para 7)
5. order for release of hra with terms (Para 8)
6. writ petition disposed, payment subject to pending appeal. (Para 9)
7. final dispositional order by court (Para 10)

Heard on : 08.07.2025 Judgment on : 08.07.2025 JAY SENGUPTA, J:

1. This is an application, inter alia, praying for release of House Rent Allowance, current and arrears, in favour of the petitioner.

2. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows.

The petitioner is an approved Headmistress at Talpukur Girls’ High School (H.S.). The husband of the petitioner being an employee of a private company is receiving House Rent Allowance (HRA) as a separate engagement. The District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas, relying on the Memorandum of the Finance Department (Audit Branch), Government of West Bengal bearing No.5839-F(P) dated July, 09, 2012 and the Corrigendum Memorandum thereto bearing No.8012-F(p2)/FA/O/2m/ 206/17(N.B.) dated December 27, 2018, stopped the payment of HRA to the petitioner. A Coordinate Bench of this Court by the judgment dated March 16, 2021 passed in WPA 1389 of 2018 (Mousumi Biswas & Ors. State of West Bengal & Ors.) has quashed the aforementioned memorandum of 2018. An appeal being MAT 1023 of 2021 (The State of West Bengal & Ors. vs. Mita Majumder & Ors.) against the said judgment and order of the said Coordinate Bench is pending. But, no order of stay has been passed in the said appeal. Relying on this judgment, relief has been granted to a similarly circumstanced individual by an order dated 21.05.2024 passed in WPA 14006 of 2024 . In view of the same, the petitioner would be entitled to full HRA along with interest on the arrears.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State denies the allegations made in the writ petition and submits that if, at all, any relief is granted to the petitioner, the same has to be subject to the decision of the appeal being MAT 1023 of 2021 .

5. It appears that the above-referred memorandum of 2018 was quashed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. However, an appeal is pending over the issue. But, no stay has been granted in the said appeal.

Relying on the said decision, another Coordinate Bench of this Court has granted appropriate relief in favour of similarly circumstanced individual.

6. In the present facts which are quite similar, I find no reason to take a different view.

7. Therefore, the concerned respondent authorities are directed to release the HRA, both current and arrear in favour of the petitioner, the arrear thereof be paid to the petitioner with interest @ 6% per annum from the date on which it became payable till the date of payment. Such payment shall be made within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

8. It is, however, made clear that the payment of HRA in terms of this order is subject to the result of the above referred pending appeal.

9. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

10. As affidavits were not called for, allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top