SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2909

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J
Basanti Sigh Sardar & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent
WPA 13126 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Uttam Kumar Roy
For the Respondents: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gupta

Retired employees are entitled to interest on delayed payment of pensionary benefits, with no limitation on claims affecting the substantive rights.

Headnote:The judgment analyzes the entitlements under pensionary benefits for deceased employees citing the ROPA Rules, 2019, which govern the payment of pensions and gratuity. The court establishes the right of the petitioners to claim interest on delayed payments after the issuance of revised orders. In addressing the delay in filing, the court notes that no statutory limitation applies and grants relief, as supported by previous case law. Consequently, the court directs payment of interest at 8% per annum on outstanding amounts to the petitioners within eight weeks.

The material facts of the case are admitted and hence I have not called for affidavits.

The husband/father of the petitioners was a Teacher of a Primary School. The husband/father of the petitioners died-in-harness on 20.07.2018. The first pension payment order was issued on 22.04.2019. Under the ROPA Rules , 2019 there was revision of the pensionary and gratuity amount payable to the petitioners. The revised pension payment order was issued on 24.01.2024 and the revised gratuity was disbursed on 25.01.2024 in terms of ROPA, 2019. The petitioners claim interest on delayed payment of the revised arrear pension and gratuity amount.

I have heard learned counsel for both parties and I have considered the orders passed by this court in similar facts. It is settled law that retired employee is entitled to some amount of interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension.

There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither of the parties has suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. No. 17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court judgement in the case of Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh , reported in (2008) 8 S.C.C. 648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment or re-fixation of pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third party.

In view of the aforesaid, I direct the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the writ petitioners @8% per annum on the revised gratuity and revised arrear pension calculated from 14.02.2020 till the date of actual payment.

Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

The writ petition is disposed of, however, no order as to costs.

Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top