Court determined that civil disputes regarding property ingress and egress should be monitored by police to prevent public disorder.

Mr. Biswarup Nandy … for the private respondent Nos.6, 7 & 9 R e The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that her ingress and egress is being obstructed at the behest of the private respondents.

Additionally, it has been submitted that in the common passage, the petitioner is obstructed for which resistance is being faced by her.

Learned advocate for the State submits that the dispute complained of is absolutely a civil dispute.

respondents submits that unnecessarily the petitioner is trying to establish her dominance over the property and for the said purpose is communicating to different administrative authorities. He further submits that the egress and ingress of the petitioner has never been interfered with.

Having considered the submissions advanced by the private respondents relating to egress and ingress as also the petitioner’s apprehension in respect of her smooth entry which should not be out of question, I direct the police authorities to keep a strict vigil and ensure that no breach of the peace and/or tranquility taking place as also no untoward incident results because of the strained relationship existing between the petitioner and the private respondents.

With the aforesaid observations, WPA 14654 of 2025 is disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.