SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3074

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH, J
MANI SQUARE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WPO/256/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Jaydip Kar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Arindam Banerjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Pranit Bag, Adv., Ms. Rituparna Chatterjee, Adv., Ms. Khushboo Choudhary, Adv., Ms. Amani Kayan, Adv., Ms. Sadia Sultana, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv., Mr. Soumabho Ghose, Adv., Mr. Pushan Kar, Adv., Mr. Sagnik Majumdar, Adv., Mr. Aurin Chakraborty, Adv., Ms. Shreya Ghosh, Adv.

Municipal authorities must accurately reflect ownership in records following judicial rulings; failure to act on rightful claims is legally unacceptable.

Headnote:The present writ petition involves the inaction of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation regarding the property ownership of premises No. 195, Picnic Garden Road, Kolkata. Petitioners, claiming absolute ownership, challenged prior records designating the property as Thika Tenancy Land subsequent to judicial findings. The court framed the issue around municipal records maintenance and the legal standing of the prior tenancy designation. The court found that the respondent's failure to amend records constituted an ongoing violation of legal rights.

… for the intervenor The Court : The petitioners have filed the present writ petition, being aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent in failing to reinstate the petitioners as the sole owners of premises No. 195, Picnic Garden Road, Kolkata, and in failing to rectify the description of the said property in the municipal records The case of the petitioners is that they are the absolute owners of the premises in question. The erstwhile owner had granted a 20-year lease of the said premises to M/s. Kumar Industries by way of a registered lease deed dated 15.12.1973. Subsequently, by an order dated 27.01.2010 passed by the Thika Controller, Kolkata, M/s. Kumar Industries was declared to be Thika Tenants under the West Bengal Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 2001, and was permitted to deposit rent with the Thika Controller. Based on this order, M/s. Kumar Industries got the property recorded in their name as Thika Tenants, and the description of the property was altered to T-195, Picnic Garden Road, Kolkata, indicating its status as Thika Tenancy Land.

The petitioners challenged the said order dated 27.01.2010 before this Court, and the Hon’ble Division Bench, by an order dated 10.03.2014, held that the land in question does not qualify as Thika Tenancy. The said order was appealed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, which, by its judgment dated 27.07.2022, held that M/s. Kumar Industries were not Thika Tenants in respect of the said premises and dismissed their claim. Both the review petition and the curative petition filed against the said judgment were also dismissed.

Thereafter, the petitioners, by representations dated 19.06.2023 and 30.12.2024, requested the Municipal Corporation to amend the municipal records by recording the petitioners as the absolute owners and to rectify the description of the property, which no longer qualifies as Thika Tenancy Land. However, till date, the respondent has not acted upon the said representations.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top