1. The present revisional application has been preferred against an order whereby the application for amendment of plaint made by the plaintiffs/petitioners in the trial court was rejected.

2. The learned trial Judge, while so rejecting, observed that the facts sought to be brought in by way of an amendment have no nexus with the controversy in the suit.

3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that since the particulars of the costs incurred etc. by the petitioners, which was the premise of the claim of damages, were not disclosed in the amendment, the learned trial Judge came to such findings. Subsequently, a comprehensive amendment application incorporating the costs incurred due to further litigation in connection with the original claim of damages has been filed in the trial court.

4. It is submitted that the present impugned order may not influence the learned trial Judge while deciding the said application.

5. Learned counsel for the defendants/opposite pa