Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Aniruddha Roy, J
Sandip Kumar Bardhan – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details about the petitioner's employment and transfers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding the legality of the transfer. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. discussion of the legal standards for employment transfers. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's final decision quashing the transfer order. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
Reserved on : June 11, 2025 Judgment on : July 10, 2025 Aniruddha Roy, J.
FACTS :
1. By virtue of a letter of engagement dated March 26, 2010, annexure- P2 at page 17 to the writ petition, the petitioner was engaged as a Field Junior Engineer of Purbasthali-II Block for a period of twelve months on contractual remuneration basis. The petitioner was posted for the said post for Sarva Shiksha Mission work as would be evident and posting letter dated March 19, 2010, annexure- P1 at page 16 to the writ petition. The engagement of the petitioner subject to the terms and conditions of the contract, was extended by a memo dated March 01, 2011, annexure-P3 at page 18 to the writ petition, until the age of attainment of 60 years. The petitioner was entitled to receive as one time gratuity of Rs. 1,00,000/- if 10 years of service is provided by him to Sa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
