CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J
Mamoni Guchait – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Mondal & Ors. – Respondent
Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Mitra …for the petitioner Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee Mr. Souvik Das Mr. K.R. Ahmed Mr. Tapas Chatterjee Mr. Rudranil Das ….for the opposite party This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff and is directed against an order being No.22 dated February 22, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), 1st Court at Howrah in Title Suit No.164 of 2022. By the order impugned, the application for local inspection was allowed.
The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the suit property has not been properly described in the plaint and for such reason the suit property cannot be identified properly. He submits that the opposite party herein filed an application for holding local inspection and in such application a schedule has been appended thereto. The learned advocate for the petitioner further submits that the property described in the application for local inspection is different from that mentioned in the schedule of the plaint.
Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the opposite party submits that the portion of the suit property in respect of which the local inspection was sought for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.