CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J
Sanjoy Pramanick & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Sushen Biswas & Ors. – Respondent
Sushen Biswas & Ors. Mr. Tapan Coomar Dey Ms. Shreya Chatterjee ..for the petitioners Mr. Atreya Chakraborty ..for the opposite parties This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff and is directed against an order being no. 25 dated 24th April, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 2nd Court at Ranaghat in Title Suit No. 72 of 2022.
By the order impugned the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure stood rejected. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the suit the plaintiff was dispossessed and for incorporating such fact the petitioners have filed the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure . In support of such contention he places reliance upon the a decision of a Co- ordinate Bench in the case of Subir Bhattacharya Vs. Sevoke Commosales LLP and Anr. reported at 2025(1) ICC
505(Cal.).
Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appears for the opposite parties. He submits that the trial of the suit has already commenced as the issues have already been framed. In support of such contention he places reliance upon a decisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.