Mr. Siddhartha Banerjee Mr. Juin Dutta Chakraborty Mr. Bidan Modak Ms. Arpita Kundu …for the petitioner Mr. Prantick Ghosh Ms. Shravani Ghosh …for the Opposite Parties This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff and is directed against an order dated 27^th January, 2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 8^th Court, Barasat, North 24-Parganas in O.S. No. 34 of 2015.

By the order impugned, the evidence of P.W. 1 stood closed.

Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the adjournment was sought for on the ground of illness of P.W. 1. He submits that an opportunity be granted to the petitioner to adduce the evidence of P.W. 1 and other witnesses.

Learned advocate, appearing for the opposite party, vehemently opposes the prayer of Mr. Banerjee. He submits that the petitioner sought for adjournment on several dates on frivolous grounds. He further submits that the petitioner should not be permitted to adduce further evidence and the evidence of P.W. 1 was rightly closed by the learned Trial Judge.

Heard learned advocate for the respective parties and perused the materials p