Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Debangsu Basak, Md. Shabbar Rashidi, JJ
Sahajamal Sk. & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. convenience of defendants in trial location. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction considerations in relation to mp/mla status. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. authority of designated courts established by supreme court rulings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's acceptance of jurisdiction despite claims of inconvenience. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion on the application disposition. (Para 14) |
Ms. Anasuya Sinha, Ld. A.P.P. Ms. Rajnandini Das, Advocate Heard on : 16.07.2025 Judgment on : 16.07.2025 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-
1. Criminal Revisional application is directed against the order dated May
14, 2024 passed in GR 320 of 2010 by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bolpur, Birbhum. It is at the behest of some of the accused in such criminal case.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the petitioners are day labourers. One of the accused in the criminal case where the petitioners stand entangled is a former Member of Parliament. He submits that, the incident alleged is of Bolpur. Petitioners are now required to defend themselves at the designated Court at Kolkata which is far away from Bolpur. It is inconvenient for the petitioners to defend themselves at th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
